COVID - 19 INSANITY!
BUSINESSES/ORGANIZATIONS THAT I AM GOING TO AVOID DUE TO MASK AND/OR VACCINE POLICIES.
~ SEE BELOW ~
*NOTE: DISCLAIMER; THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTS MY PERSONAL OPINION AND CHOICE, I AM NOT RECOMMENDING OR DIRECTING THAT ANYONE ELSE DO THE SAME. ANYONE IS FREE TO POST THEIR OWN PERSONAL OPINION IN THIS SPACE AND EVERYONE IS FREE TO SPEND THEIR MONEY IN BUSINESSES OF THEIR OWN CHOOSING.*
Please feel free to submit the businesses/organizations that you choose to avoid, please include your reasons why and the City/Town and State. We can't include it without all the info. Thank you!
On February 1, 2022, ICAN, through its attorneys, submitted two Freedom of Information Act requests to the CDC for any documentation concerning confirmed COVID-19 deaths in children 11 years old or younger, and in 12- to 15-year-old children.
On March 10, 2022, the CDC sent this astonishing response to both of these requests:
NCHS [National Center for Health Statistics] has not conducted the analyses requested for this age group and therefore cannot provide you with a data product.
So, despite not having conducted the “analyses” of its own data for either of these age groups and, therefore, not being able to cite even one confirmed case of a healthy child 15 years old or younger dying from COVID-19, the CDC felt confident enough not only to relentlessly promote COVID-19 vaccines to these children, but it also makes the truly incredible claim that “COVID-19 ranks as one of the top 10 causes of death for children ages 5 though 11 years.” This, despite the fact that, when pressed for proof of that statement, the CDC admits it hasn’t analyzed its own data and cannot provide any.
Here is where it gets even more interesting. Coincidentally, just four days after sending the response to ICAN’s attorneys claiming it had not done these analysis of pediatric COVID-19 deaths, on March 14, 2022, the CDC removed tens of thousands of deaths linked to COVID-19, including 416 (or 24%) of the pediatric deaths, on its data tracker website! By way of explanation, the CDC added a footnote, saying: “An adjustment was made to COVID Data Tracker’s mortality data involving the removal of 72,277 deaths previously reported across 26 states. An error in CDC’s algorithm led to misclassifying deaths that were not COVID-19 related. The algorithm has since been corrected.” We can only speculate about what made the CDC revisit its numbers and correct them, but the timing sure is interesting.
It is precisely this type of game play (or possibly incompetence) that definitively proves yet again why federal “health” authority recommendations should never be relied upon to mandate or require any medical product or intervention, and ICAN will continue to fight for the basic right of every American to choose, without government coercion, his or her own medical care.
To share this legal update, please use this link: https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/cdc-cannot-provide-an-instance-of-a-single-confirmed-covid-19-death-in-a-child-younger-than-16/
U.S. Sewer Data Warns of a New Bump in Covid Cases After Lull
Even the idiots have finally figured it out!
Russell Brand starts to get it!
CDC/FDA smoking gun of smoking guns
They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they “contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it’s called a self-fulfilling prophecy
This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin
by Jon Rappoport
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Quiz: If an agency of the federal government revealed they had no basis for constructing a diagnostic test that was used on millions of people; but the test was the cornerstone of a national lockdown; and the lockdown drove the economy off a cliff; and destroyed millions of lives; however, NOW, that agency says, they DO have a basis for the test; would you buy what they’re selling?
If your answer is yes, you’re in good company; the company I call Blind, Ignorant, Denialist, Hoaxing Journalists.
The CDC issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions.
The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” The CDC isn’t saying that at all.
They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020---right up to this minute.
In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:
“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up (invented) synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.
This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus---the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results. THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN’T HAVE.
BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.
If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.
Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”:
They have a soup they make in their labs.
This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.
This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation could kill the cells.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.
Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”
To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We assume, without proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”
Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect.
~~~
BUSINESSES/ORGANIZATIONS THAT I AM GOING TO AVOID DUE TO MASK AND/OR VACCINE POLICIES.
CDC
WHO
FDA
Author Michael Connelly
Author Brad Taylor
Olive Country Store, Shokan NY
Fruition Chocolate, Shokan NY
Rip Van Winkle Brewery, Palenville NY
AT&T
CNN and ALL the Fake News Outlets (FOX included)
NFL, NBA, MLB, basically all major league sports besides Hockey.
World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab and his group of criminals
The United Nations, globalist criminals
The Clinton Foundation
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation
Georgie Soros and his Open Society Foundation
WPDH, Townsquare Media
iHeart Radio
ANY HOSPITALS, CLINICS, DOCTORS AND NURSES THAT COLLABORATED IN THE COVID NARRATIVE
NY Times
Washington Post
FORBES
Wall Street Journal
HANNAFORD’s SUPERMARKETS
LOWES HOME IMPROVEMENT CENTERS
Author Stephen King